• The comparison of implementation of rural development by agricultural extension system at grassroots level between Thailand and China

  • วารสารวิทยาสารเกษตรศาสตร์ สาขาสังคมศาสตร์

  • Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences

  • ก.ค.-ธ.ค. 2546

  • 0125-8370

  • 2003

  • Ming Zhan
    Patana Sukprasert
    Mulliga Khewan
    Ubolwan Arayaphong
    Sawat Virawongprom
    Chainanarong Tongpuy

  • Vol. 24 NO. 2 Page 192-206

  • http://kasetsartjournal.ku.ac.th/kuj_files/2008/A080404164510.pdf

  • อังกฤษ

  • E14-เศรษฐศาสตร์การพัฒนา

  • E50-ชนบท

  • C20-การส่งเสริม

  • Local farmers;Rural area; Rural development;Policy;Agricultural extension;Technology Transfer;Technology service;Township agricultural techniques extension station;Thailand;China

  • This study focused on the comparison of implementation of agricultural extension to rural development between Thailand and China. Thailand is distinguished from China in terms of approaches to implementation of agricultural extension. The noticeable distinction lies in that alternatives chosen by Thailand are public, participatory approach and need oriented way, while those chosen by China are mixed public and private, top-down, technology driven way. However, the conventional extension methods such as demonstration, mass media are still the major choice both in Thailand and China. Agricultural Technology Transfer and Service Center (ATTC), as the fundamental operational extension institution at grassroots level in Thailand, firstly makes developing plans, and then conducts the extension activities by steering committee under the help of facilitators in participatory way. ATTC conducts various well-planned training activities through learning by systematic observations, training by successful farmer and specialists by demonstration, mass media, and live project, but most important learning process is highly emphasized to build up the farmer's capacity of self-reliance. Meanwhile Township Agricultural Techniques Extension Station (TATES) is the fundamental, operational extension agency at grassroots level in China, which implements extension programmes under the top-down direction. It is noticeable that it is flexible, diversified extension approaches co-exist in China, such as "Technical contracts between extension agents and farmer households", "Technique and agricultural input combination approach", "Extension by Technical Association in the village", "the company-led extension", other than the conventional approach. Those approaches are really practical to accommodate the

  • [1] Ming Zhan (Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan (China). Agronomy Department)
    [2] Patana Sukprasert (Kasetsart University, Bangkok (Thailand). Faculty of Agriculture)
    [3] Mulliga Khewan (Department of Agricultural Extension, Bangkok (Thailand))
    [4] Ubolwan Arayaphong (Department of Agricultural Extension, Bangkok (Thailand))
    [5] Sawat Virawongprom (Department of Agricultural Extension, Bangkok (Thailand))
    [6] Chainanarong Tongpuy (Department of Agricultural Extension, Bangkok (Thailand))

198 48

  ไฟล์ดิจิทัล

  Export

  ค้นเพิ่มเติม

Ming Zhan and others. (2003). The comparison of implementation of rural development by agricultural extension system at grassroots level between Thailand and China.  Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 24 (2) ,192-206


Ming Zhan and others. "The comparison of implementation of rural development by agricultural extension system at grassroots level between Thailand and China" Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 24, 2003, 192-206.

Ming Zhan and others. (2003). The comparison of implementation of rural development by agricultural extension system at grassroots level between Thailand and China.  Kasetsart Journal of Social Sciences, 24 (2) ,192-206